Agriculture, Direct Speech, Investments, Latvia, Ukraine
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Monday, 25.11.2024, 10:43
Chairman of the Board of “Agrolats Holding”: Latvian agricultural holding is trying to save its Ukrainian investments from a respectable American investment fund
A couple of years ago it was said that you have
the biggest family in business in Latvia with three generations being
represented. Is that still the case and how many family members are actively
involved in the business? Who does what?
We started
out as a family-run business twenty years ago and we are still developing it
today. If at first it was just a couple of family members working in the
business, then today we already have three generations, and we are expanding to
more and more agriculture-related business sectors. Today, companies owned by
our family in Latvia employ over 600 people.
Which business area is closer to your own
heart, or do you manage them all?
My main
function is strategic advice. We set our main strategic targets that our
companies will strive towards, the rest is up to the board, which has to
actually implement the work. Our strategy is to have separate business areas
that are still inter-related and complement each other. We try to generate as
much added value as we can for all of our products. For example, Agrofirma
Tērvete grows grain, which is used to produce beer. We grow our own animal
feed. Part of the milk we produce, we process ourselves — we make
ice-cream, sell part of what is produced. Manure is further processed into
biogas and consequently used to produce electricity and heat. The heat is, in
turn, used in beer production, and heating for the local parish, school and
houses. The digestive by-product from the production of biogas is used as
fertilizer on our fields.
This year “Agrolats Holding” has registered
changes in capital and company officials, including naming former head of
“Swedbank” Māris Mančinksis as Vice-Chairman of the Board. What is the reason
for these changes?
In any
business sector or area, you always have to seek out people who are smarter
than you. Māris Mančinskis is a very experienced individual who has
worked in finance for a very long time and is familiar with various types of
business. We look for people who can give a contribution through their
experience, and he is one such person. We are grateful that he has agreed to
join us. I think this is a big win for us.
How has Covid-19 affected your various business
areas?
No year is
the same in agriculture. The past three years were not easy for any
farmer — big or small. Our business is rather diversified. We have
production, processing, storage, as well as sales — that makes it easier
to get through these difficult times. At the moment, we feel the fall in milk
prices the most. Milk prices have dropped by 50 euros.
The Ministry of Agriculture has drafted a
EUR 613 million programme to help rural business recover from the
crisis created by Covid-19. What is your opinion on this?
What the
Ministry is doing, is, of course, very good. But if someone says it’s a huge
amount of money, I have to say that it’s really not. If you divide this funding
among 80,000 farms or based on the tonnes of milk produced, it’s nothing. If we
produce 25,000 tonnes of milk, but receive EUR 100,000 in aid, how much is
that per tonne? The support is minimal. We’ve lost more than a million euros,
but we could potentially get up to EUR 100,000 in aid. We will be nowhere
near break-even; we will be working at a loss.
Which state-aid mechanisms have you used?
The
government decisions taken so far have not really applied to us. For example,
as regards dairy farming. We have about 2,500 dairy cows, so we cannot receive
aid for all of them, because there are certain ceilings set based on the number
of cows. Therefore, the state-aid is unequal: someone gets more per tonne of
milk, someone gets less. But despite that, I am proud to say that we have been
able to keep all of our employees, we have not cut back production volumes. For
example, the average monthly salary of employees at “Agrofirma Tērvete” is over
EUR 1,150. That is our greatest value — our people. Likewise, we are
also continuing to pay significant amounts in taxes. If we calculate how much
we pay in taxes for our farmed land, then last year we paid more than
EUR 2,200 per hectare, and that is just the taxes.
Do you think the eligibility criteria for aid
should be revised and changed?
As for our
sector, I think we need eligibility criteria that are understandable to
everyone and easily applied. My proposal would be that aid is paid for each
tonne of milk sold to consumers, rather than per cow. Some companies sell more
than 95% of the milk they produce, while others don't even sell half of their
production. That means someone gets more, someone gets less. I think there
should be two directions in allocation of support. First, regardless of the
size of the company — big or small — support payments should be
allocated based on the proportional amount of milk you have sold. Second, I
would suggest reducing the tax burden on production during this time. For
example, “Agrofirma Tērvete” pays more than EUR 1 million in social
insurance contributions for its employees. It would be a great help, if the
government were to release us from part of these payments for now. This is
easily administrated and would provide a direct and tangible benefit to
everyone. That would be support.
The Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
has proposed that the government should cover the employers’ part of the state
social insurance mandatory contributions of 24.09% for the part of the gross
salary over a certain threshold. Do you agree?
Yes, we
agree. We think this would be totally appropriate.
Society often tends to think that farmers just
keep producing and selling their products, and they don’t really need any
support...
Yes, but
you have to understand what the price of that production is for the farmer. The
number of cows in Latvia was decreased by more than 10,000 over the last two
years, which means that farmers can’t stay on the market with a price that
would allow them to keep producing. Of course, some farms shut down production
due to old age, because there is no one to take over.
What has been the primary market for your milk
until now? Neighbouring countries?
We export
all of our milk to Lithuania, because of the significant difference in the
price that we can get for it here in Latvia and over there. Our milk is very
high quality, so buyers are willing to pay more for it. We are constantly in
touch with milk processing plants in Latvia, but unfortunately the price they
offer is lower.
What is the reason for milk prices in Latvia
being lower than elsewhere?
The price
of milk is determined by supply and demand. More than 800 tonnes of milk leaves
Latvia every day. What can be concluded from that is that there isn’t enough
demand here in Latvia. Furthermore, the competition in milk processing in
Latvia is very tough: there are a lot of companies that process small volumes.
Therefore, efficiency is hard to achieve. Lithuania has long since consolidated
its milk processing sector — there are four or five major companies in the
market which basically process all of the milk there is. That gives much more
room to manoeuvre and work more efficiently.
You also grow cereals. What is the current
situation in crop farming? Are grain prices stable or is there a downward
trend?
This winter
seems to have been a good one for the majority or nearly all crop farmers,
despite the fact that there was no real winter to speak of. Grain prices are
stable. We have already concluded the majority of contracts for sale of our
grain. Sales contracts are still outstanding for only small volumes of grain,
rapeseed and other cultures. We are constantly looking for better species,
analysing which is better to grow at a specific time. It is just like with any
other type of business. You have to seek new solutions and constantly improve
yourself.
Has the сoronavirus crisis made you review your goals for this year?
Situations
like this, of course, always call for certain adjustments. But our goal remains
the same — to continue developing the whole of our production, develop all
our business areas in Latvia. We reviewed out international business already a
few years ago. New major risks have come up for various businesses we have in
various countries. We determinedly bring money back here to Latvia and we
believe that we should invest it in Latvia.
Do you plan on expanding your business in
Latvia?
We have
focused on expansion here every year. Every year we have acquired new companies
and started working in new business areas. We will continue to do so, if we can
and the circumstances allow us to. Our business is based on three pillars:
production, processing and sales. This is the model we are trying to maintain
and go forward with.
Do you agree that the preconditions for working
in agriculture in Lithuania and Estonia are better than in Latvia, or not?
There are
certain advantages and certain drawbacks in each country. For example,
Lithuania has much smaller cattle herds than Latvia, so the quality of milk is
significantly lower. Secondly, the logistics of milk collection is much more
expensive. The situation in Estonia, as compared to Latvia, is much better, the
average herd size is much larger than in Latvia, which gives them certain
advantages in the dairy sector. Likewise, we can compare electricity prices,
roads, many factors, but I don’t want to go into detailed comparisons and say
that the situation is better over there than here. It is, what it is. We plan
to maintain our business here, we are not planning to move elsewhere. Of
course, we are keeping our eyes open: if we see an opportunity come up,
naturally, we can decide to take advantage of it. I am not saying that we will
never go anywhere else and not do anything else. But in the current situation
we will support what we have here in Latvia.
What about investments? Have you put plans on
hold due to the uncertainty of the future?
We are not
planning any major investments in any of our companies this year. We will
develop further the things that we are already doing. Each company has certain
investment plans, but they are not as large-scale as they were a couple of
years ago, when we invested over EUR 30 million in “Agrofirma Tērvete”
to further live-stock farming, the brewery and biogas production. We don’t have
any such large investments planned at the moment, but we want to significantly
improve the efficiency of what we have been doing so far. You can never predict
when a company worth investing in will appear. If we come across such a
company, we will examine the possibility. We have created a board that
purposefully looks at various production and business directions. If it sees
such an investment as possible and useful, we will, of course, think about it.
As far as I know, you have businesses in
Ukraine, Morocco, Dubai. How much of your business is currently abroad?
A rather large part. It might be around a third of our total business.
Are you not worried about diversifying your
markets, not placing all your eggs in one basket?
Of course,
we are diversifying our markets. But if we see major risks come up that we have
no way of controlling or mitigating, then we have to recuse ourselves from
certain countries. The level of corruption in many countries is extremely high.
Even in countries where we started doing business ten years ago or more when
the level of corruption was much lower, and we could work safely. The situation
has changed.
By that so you mean the increase in corruption
in CIS countries?
CIS, but
also elsewhere to a certain extent. A different issue is the form that corruption
takes in different countries. Whether it directly affects the company or
business it is in. It is a little different in every country. But it is much
easier to control your business in the country that you know best.
In Ukraine you have a joint venture with “NCH
Capital”. What does this business do?
Ukraine has
long since been known as the breadbasket of Europe, that’s why this market was
interesting for us. A little over 12 years ago, we founded the joint
venture “Golden Sunrise” in Ukraine. Back then we were approached by Kārlis
Cerbulis, head of the Latvian office of what seemed to us a very
respectable US-based investment fund NCH Capital, and offered us a
partnership. We signed an investment agreement which provided that NCH would
fund the project, while we would supply our know-how in agriculture and
production, manage the day-to-day business.
The company
is very successful, stable and profitable. Its average EBITDA indicator is
EUR 8-10 million per year. It has over 30,000 hectares of land and
two elevators under its management. It produces everything that can be obtained
from the land: cereals, maize, rapeseed and other cultures, which are then sold
on our international markets.
I understand that there has been a disagreement
with NCH and its even gone to court. Could you, please, elaborate what the
disagreement is about?
About four
years ago NCH started taking over our joint venture “Golden Sunrise”.
They set up their own off-shores, from which our joint venture had to
take out loans, buy raw materials for an inflated price, and sell to them our
products at prices below-market value. That way part of the company profits
were siphoned out of the company. Furthermore, the NCH staff policy, which is
unethical to say the least, was absolutely unacceptable to us. We began to take
a strict stand against all of this, and as a result, NCH has, to our mind,
hijacked the management of the company, ignoring our mutual investment
agreement. Of course, we could discuss at length various actions that could
only be classified as 90’s style activity: illegal takeovers, hijacking of
management, falsification of minutes of meetings, just like in the movies.
What is your opinion of the justice system in
Ukraine? Do you even have a chance of a verdict in your favour?
Over the
past couple of years Ukraine has placed itself on a development path towards
European style democracy, which gives hope for a just and fair settlement of
disputes. But, if we look closer, we know that there are still quite a lot of
cases like this. An especially big problem in Ukraine is related to registers
where entries are made regarding company shareholders, officials etc. It is
precisely the shady and possibly corrupt actions of these registers and
registrars that has made possible much of the illegal actions we see today. It
is, of course, clear that there has been some behind all of these actions. We
think that the Ukrainian government has not done everything it could have to
provide to us, as an investor, an environment based on the rule of law, and
possibilities to stand up for ourselves.
How many legal proceedings have been started in
relation to this case?
There were several violations identified in the case. At first, we wanted to resolve the matter peacefully through negotiation. We started to point out that their actions were wrong and unacceptable, that they were not in our mutual interest. When we said that, the illegal takeover began. As I mentioned, there were minutes of meetings that had never actually taken place.
They arbitrarily and
illegally fired the director, replacing him with their own. The rest just
logically followed — products were sold, loan agreements concluded for
unfavourable interest rates. This has a significant impact on the value of our
business in Ukraine compared to what it was, say, two years ago. We never
expected something like this to be done by a respectable American foundation
that has invested more than a billion US dollars in Eastern Europe, we never
even imagined that things like this were still being done today. The investors
of this foundation are well-known universities, various organisations that
fight for universal values, a sustainable world and fair business practices.
I’m not sure these noble goals justify the use of what we see as unfairly
obtained means. We are not willing to use gangster methods to achieve
something, we never have and never will. We cannot work alongside someone who
employs such methods.
Yes, there
are several parallel legal proceedings ongoing in Ukraine right now. Among
other things, the Ukrainian court has already found certain NCH actions to have
been illegal and has reinstated our director, but what good is that if another
meeting is falsified the next day and our director illegally removed once
again? That is why we also turned to the Latvian, as well as the US courts and
law enforcement authorities.
If the verdict is to some extent not in your
favour, what is the worst impact it could have on your business?
I am not
allowing for the possibility of a worst-case scenario, because we have acted
properly, legally and punctually. We have done everything in strict accordance
with the law and our agreement. The decision cannot be against us. We will not rest,
and we will find a solution. Thank God, we live in a civilised country, in
Europe, and I now have the chance to compare how courts work in Latvia and what
methods they use in Ukraine. We do live at quite another level, and I am very
pleased and proud of that.
How much of your total portfolio does the
business in Ukraine account for?
I cannot
really say, but it definitely does not affect our business in Latvia — we
will continue to work according to plan. These are two totally separate things.
The business in Ukraine is just one branch of the whole tree. But I want to
stress once more that we have always tried to resolve all issues in a proper
manner, and I would like to believe that justice will be served.
What will be the focus of your activity for the
rest of this year?
We will
continue to develop the business we have begun and work in all of its
directions. Despite the current situation in the world and domestically, we
have managed to keep all of our jobs and we will fight for our people. We are
constantly examining our performance; if there will be areas where performance
deteriorates or if we see that there are no more future prospects, then we will
decide on what to do — whether to reduce or completely shut down that
specific business direction. Our main goal for this year is to significantly
boost the efficiency of all of our business sectors, all of our companies. We
see opportunities in all of them to improve productivity, raise the quality of
the products or increase market share, optimise costs. This year’s objective is
becoming more efficient.
- 28.01.2022 BONO aims at a billion!
- 26.08.2021 LLC Dizozols Investments finalizes investment attraction deal with Crowdestor with record-high profits
- 25.01.2021 Как банкиры 90-х делили «золотую милю» в Юрмале
- 30.12.2020 Накануне 25-летия Балтийский курс/The Baltic Course уходит с рынка деловых СМИ
- 30.12.2020 On the verge of its 25th anniversary, The Baltic Course leaves business media market
- 30.12.2020 Business Education Plus предлагает анонсы бизнес-обучений в январе-феврале 2021 года
- 30.12.2020 Hotels showing strong interest in providing self-isolation service
- 29.12.2020 В Латвии вводят комендантский час, ЧС продлена до 7 февраля
- 29.12.2020 В Rietumu и в этот раз создали особые праздничные открытки и календари 2021
- 29.12.2020 Latvia to impose curfew, state of emergency to be extended until February 7